Something shifted around 2019. Not a meteor strike, not a revolution, more like the world’s operating system quietly updated while no one was looking. Since then, reality has felt slightly desynchronised. Time bends in ways it never used to. People feel thinner somehow, less grounded in the moment. The familiar texture of life, that background hum of continuity and connection, seems to have developed a delay.
Most of us sense it but can’t quite name it. Psychologists, sociologists, and data analysts, however, have been tracing its outline for years. This feeling isn’t superstition; it’s the psychological residue of a world that was reformatted in real time.
Before the fracture, daily life had a rhythm. Commutes, lunch breaks, classroom bells, those tedious repetitions we thought we hated were actually the scaffolding of sanity. They gave the brain something solid to hang time on. When that structure vanished in early 2020, the mind lost its bearings. Days bled into one another. The boundaries that separated weekday from weekend dissolved. More than sixty-five percent of people reported being unable to distinguish one day from another (PMC, 2023). It wasn’t laziness; it was environmental dislocation, the same disorientation submariners and prisoners experience when their surroundings stop changing.
Even when restrictions eased, the scaffolding didn’t return. Work stayed online. Classrooms became hybrid. Social lives moved into permanent partial existence. We thought we were restoring normality, but we were really installing a new version of life that no longer required physical presence. Predictability, once the defining trait of reality, became optional.
That’s when time itself began to warp. Everyone says 2019 feels like yesterday and a lifetime ago. That contradiction isn’t nostalgia; it’s neurology. Time only stretches when the mind encounters novelty. When everything is the same, the brain stops generating distinct memories, and the years collapse into a single blurred block. Researchers now call this the 2020 Effect, an era in which monotony caused time to slow in the moment but compress in hindsight (The Villanovan, 2025). Pre-2020 memories feel close because they were encoded during motion; the years that followed feel lost because nothing left a trace. Even now, the constant repetition of digital life, the same feeds, the same thumbnails, the same outrage, keeps novelty starvation alive. Time didn’t speed up or slow down. We just stopped producing it.
You’d think two years of isolation would have primed people for an explosion of social energy. Instead, the opposite happened. Humanity withdrew. Sociologists call it the Great Withdrawal, a global pivot toward self-containment and localism (GWI Vibe Shift, 2025). Civic participation, volunteerism, even curiosity about other cultures fell. It wasn’t a sudden collapse of empathy; it was a defensive reflex. When the world feels unstable, exposure feels dangerous. People tightened their circles, prioritising stability over connection.
Shops quietly replaced staff with screens. Meetings became rectangles of faces. Customer support became an illusion performed by scripts and chatbots. It isn’t dystopia by conspiracy; it’s optimisation by exhaustion. The more efficient the system becomes, the less human it feels. That hollow undertone running through modern life is simply the sound of friction being erased.
While people were coping, the machines were upgrading. The pandemic compressed a decade of digital adoption into a single year. Algorithms took control of distribution, persuasion, and attention. Platforms no longer sell information, they sell emotion. Outrage, amusement, envy, anything that keeps the dopamine cycle alive. By 2021, people were spending more time online than they did doing anything else except sleeping. The physical world became an intermission between scrolls.
Traditional media, already fragile, shattered. Audiences migrated to podcasts, newsletters, and algorithmic feeds; consumption of political podcasts alone rose by over fifty percent (GWI Vibe Shift, 2025). The result looked like democracy of information but functioned more like atomisation. Each of us now inhabits a personalised universe tuned to our emotional frequencies. Truth didn’t vanish; it splintered into infinite, emotionally optimised variations. We didn’t lose control of reality. We outsourced it, to whoever could keep us scrolling the longest.
Behind the psychological fracture lurked an economic one. Inflation, automation, and the slow decay of job loyalty created what sociologists now describe as a meaning recession, burnout not from overwork but from circular work, effort that produces nothing tangible. Financial anxiety overtook climate concern and social activism. Pragmatism replaced idealism because survival replaced aspiration. Younger generations, once assumed to be inherently progressive, began drifting toward conservatism out of fatigue, not ideology. The data shows an eighteen-percent rise among Gen Z in acceptance of traditional gender roles between 2020 and 2024 (GWI 2025). In chaos, certainty sells.
Meaning used to come from continuity, education leading to career, effort leading to progress. But when time and truth wobble, those ladders collapse. What remains is a constant low-level dread, not fear of catastrophe, just the suspicion that tomorrow can’t be trusted to behave.
And when logic falters, mythology fills the gap. Online forums began describing the sensation of dislocation in metaphysical language: reality shifted three degrees to the left. Every déjà vu, every Mandela Effect became a data point in a theory that the simulation had glitched (r/SimulationTheory, 2025). It’s absurd, but psychologically tidy. If the world feels broken, maybe the code is faulty. Believing that existence bugged itself is easier than accepting that human systems did.
The metaphor works because life already behaves like a simulation. Our experiences are mediated by code; our memories are backed up to servers. The algorithms shaping our emotions run faster than we can think. The distance between “the world is glitched” and “the world is online” has narrowed to almost nothing.
Psychologists have a term for the residual state we’re living in: temporal disintegration, the brain’s inability to place events in order once routine collapses (Psychology Today, 2020). We exist in a rolling present tense, trapped between nostalgia and refresh rate. Notifications have replaced days; updates have replaced seasons. Memory has no quiet space to settle. Time isn’t flowing anymore. It’s buffering.
So when people say the world feels off, they’re not being poetic. They’re describing a measurable disconnect between consciousness and environment. The pre-2019 world depended on shared tempo, workweeks, calendars, rituals, the mutual belief that cause and effect still linked up. Those rhythms are gone. What’s replaced them is fluid, decentralised, permanently online.
Maybe the world didn’t break. Maybe it just accelerated beyond the speed humans can metabolise. That faint hum of unease we all hear isn’t depression; it’s latency. The world has already moved on. We just haven’t finished loading yet.
This is also covered over on our Youtube channel if you like your information in the moving talking format 🙂